Here comes another post in "remarks from awesome DDD Europe 2016" series. If you find it boring or not really revealing, I'm the one to be blamed - some ideas, especially related to modelling & design are truly hard to convey. Many software developers are really...
Do you know any software craftsmanship practitioners who got fascinated by DDD [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain-driven_design]? By its cleaniness, simplicity or completeness? People who have found the way proposed by Evans their missing tool for describing complex domains in a simple way? I know quite a few...
I've already promised myself some time ago: > "No more conference reviews, chap." But I'll start 2016 with breaking this rule once again, just so I can tell you that ... DDD Europe 2016 [http://dddeurope.com/2016/] was way better than I expected. No...
I keep forgetting how diverse & "flavor-rich" is our industry (software development). Not just in terms of tools, but also outlooks, opinions & overall openness to change. Within last two weeks I was exposed to software engineers ... 1. ... complaining on Microsoft going to fast with their web stack...
I'm spending a lot of time with Pluralsight [https://www.pluralsight.com/] - actually they publish more interesting stuff than I can comprehend in my limited timeframe. Once in a while I find there a course that may not be in my (still wide, I think) area of...
Uncertainty, uncertainty everywhere You know what's the most common error people make when trying to embrace DDD? They tend to focus on DDD's specific DSL (terminology, composition) - entities, boundaries, aggregate roots, etc. because they think that this particular modeling model (OMG, recurrence detected, stack overflow...
