How I got myself into alchemy - part I

I am a notorious cheater. in 2001 I've betrayed Java for .NET until late 2006-2007 I've been involved in several, stormy romances with unmanaged C++ (we had some past already...

3 years ago

Latest Post How does Dunning–Kruger effect impact collaboration in tech teams by Sebastian Gebski

I am a notorious cheater.

People keep asking me: what's the point in moving from a well-acknowledged, resource-rich, popular & market-demanded platform like .NET to such a niche, that almost no-one has heard about?

And that's what this blog post is about.

Why did I decide to go out of the comfort zone?

First, I don't aim to be the coolest kid on the block by knowing the biggest number of languages or frameworks. Actually, being able to declare a variable in 20 different dialects does not make us better craftsmen by itself. If you know well (let me emphasize that again - well) one language / platform of reasonable versatility (like Java or C#/.NET), you can pretty much cover majority of so-called market. What really matters in that case is how good you actually are in using this one, particular language / platform; the choice is usually far less crucial than you may think.

But let me quote Nathan Marz - creator of Apache Storm:

Different languages / platforms represent different paradigms, introduce different patterns / ideas for solving similar problems with different tools & approaches. The point is not to round-robin through all of them (new day = new framework ...), but to learn the differences, cognitively expand your thinking horizon, broaden your palette of techniques & make your own opinions on various problems & their most viable solutions.

Sometimes, you just have an urge to cover more ground. In my case I wanted to try lightweight client apps, so I've decided to try JavaScript-based SPAs. Similar thing has happened when I have been tempted by ultra-rich JVM-friendly Hadoop ecosystem that doesn't really get along with Microsoft stack - I needed a language that compiles to JVM bytecode and at the same time it is not Java ;)

Why Elixir and not something else?

Due to three reasons:

  1. It offers what I wanted from Scala, but it has failed to deliver
  2. It offers what I wanted from Erlang, but I've found it "not digestible enough"
  3. Elixir community is freakin' awesome

Let me elaborate a bit more on that:

My first impression about Scala was quite typical:

This is a modern language I've always wanted - mixes all the best features of other languages in a concise, coherent boundaries!

Wow, Functional Programming can be really cool, without giving up object-oriented foundation!

I can use all the JVM-based goodies without dirtying my hands with Java, neat!

OMG, actor model & Akka are awesome!

All these syntactic sugar pearls ... so yummie & fun-packed ...

What has happened next was typical (for Scala) as well.

Don't get me wrong, I still love Scala, but it seems broken in a way that's really, really hard to fix ;/

What about Erlang? It's not hard to figure that out: proven language fit for a purpose, incredible capabilities as a testimony of nearly-prophetic intentions of its creators, but ... it feels extremely dated in terms of tooling, conventions, syntactic concepts, etc. In other words - if you're about to create telephony application for some TelCo, go for it. But if your aim is something as extraordinary as a web app, well ...

Mixing Erlang with Ruby sounded like the dumbest idea ever, but ... surprisingly it has worked. Elixir has all the advantages of Elixir (& many pros of Scala), but it is devoid of almost all their flaws.

Still, it wont' solve your problems "auto-magically". These two quotes by Andrzej Śliwa describe it perfectly:

The next post in the series can be found here.

In the following post(s) I'll try to answer the following questions:

Pic: © aga7ta -

Sebastian Gebski

Published 3 years ago


Leave us your opinion.

Subscribe our newsletter

Recieve news directly to your email.

No Kill Switch © 2018.