The more I think about it, the more I am against strict code ownership ("my stuff = my commits"). I mean - yes, there has to be someone who 'owns' the piece of functionality (for the sole purpose of supervision, roadmapping, etc.), but the more people put hands on it, the better. And the reasoning I have is not code-focused (related to quality, tech debt,
To err is human - I admit I was very wrong about what “comfort zone” really is and what does it truly mean. My approach has changed over the time and nowadays I have a totally opposite opinion, when compared with what I was thinking few years ago. And that’s what this post is about.
"Comfort zone" (http://en.wikipedia.